This shouldnt even have one star...
Jose Gomez | NYC | 08/24/2005
(1 out of 5 stars)
"There's a difference between making a home movie and making a horror film. It seems the director may have forgotten this small detail as he had one of the vampire sisters spitting out all the blood she drank while showering (Why didnt she just swallow it instead of sensually bathing and letting it drip out of her mouth?) which was obviously cough syrup. This is not a serious movie. In fact, its a fine line between b porn and c movies. If you want to be teased and not see sex, and if you want to be lead on into thinking something could ever result from the poor acting and terrible story, dont see this. If you want a good laugh, please see it."
Gore, lovely vampire women and humor.
Michael Valdivielso | Alexandria, VA | 01/01/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"What more could you ask for? First, there is the imaginative idea of three female vampires using a webcam site to, not only produce an income, but also lure male victims to their lair. In other words they pick winners, men who spend more than the others, to sup on. The men think their fetish dreams will be answered. And they ARE allowed to live just long enough to make them, and us - the viewers - happy just before they are killed in all kinds of very nasty ways. Think Tool Time.
The three vampires, played by the cute Darla Albornoz, the tall Jeannie Michelle Jamseon and the very shapely Syn DeVil, are just the kind of vampires I would enjoy being drained by. As long as they didn't use a saw to kill me. Ewwww...
The women are pretty and their characters work well together, the outfits are fun - tight leather, little girl outfits, kinky footware - and there is enough humor to balance out the pools of fake blood. There is some nudity but nothing to overcome the R rating of the movie.
Add a blooper reel, a making of featurette, a commentary and even the closing credits of the movie are fun to watch. Dance, Darla, dance! Just tons of fun!"
Vampire Bore!!
Steve67 | Dallas, Texas United States | 03/13/2007
(1 out of 5 stars)
"Another bad film with bad acting bad effects and just a bad plot. There not much here accept some nudity. Three vampire sisters lure men into there house through their sex web sight. Then of course eat suck their blood, how original. Then a cop gets on their tale and you know the rest of the story. A real bore fest. I bought this one and Vampire sisters 2. Both stunk. I will give Vampire Sisters 2 this it had a lot more nudity other than that these movies offer nothing new or cool. Bad film making at it's best."
Good on paper, lousy delivery makes it a waste
Graves | Pennsylvania | 10/06/2009
(2 out of 5 stars)
"Vampire Sisters is a film that looks good on paper but the execution is so badly bobbled that you're left wondering if there was ever any purpose in it. A handful of actors and almost all the sets are in what is obviously someone's suburban house it gives `low budget' a bad name.
The idea is that three lady Vampires earn a living running a porn site with lucky `winners' invited to their lair for special services, which of course means being a meal for the vamps. It seems perfect but they've gotten sloppy and a local vice cop is starting to sniff around their business seeing the `lucky winners' as johns for personal services that cross the legal line.
So far this actually sounds pretty good and acceptable if you have an eye for schlocky horror. The problem is the good stuff ends there. The film doesn't know if it wants to be soft core porn, vampire horror or even a social commentary on the (mis)use of the internet. If it tried and failed that would be one thing but this doesn't even try. It just goes through the motions with the most skin being revealing outfits and the occasional bared breast.
The lucky winners' fantasies are usually little more than dancing before they are chomped on. There's not only no sex but no sense of seduction, that these glamorous women are luring them in, so it doesn't even come across as soft core porn. The routine is some sweaty doofus shows up. Vamp aims her cleavage at him. He starts staring, she does something extremely unpleasant with a metal tool.
The only scene that seems to carry any real juice is a minor one in which one of the vamps kidnaps a Latina and brings her home because she wanted something different for dinner. The girl tries to escape and for a few moments we have an idea of what this could have been. In the end though this only serves to make the rest of the flick even more unsatisfying since that one scene proves they can get it right is they want to, but didn't.
In the end this is a couple of attractive girls, sorry but "Syn Devil" is too gross to count, strutting around but not only can't they provide a good vampire flick, they can't even generate enough teasing interest for this to be a skin flick. It is a complete and utter waste of time.
"