Turbulence should have been grounded
10/20/2000
(1 out of 5 stars)
"Like the original "Turbulence," this one was a low budget version of the first. Unlike the first one, this flick has half the passengers aboard a stricken 747 as terrorist and the other as "fear of flying" passengers to overcome the fear of flying. There's a madman, the plane is in trouble, and a passenger must save the plane on return to Seattle. The low budget effect shows on the airplane's cockpit and the plane on the runway shows the passengers evacuating from a Boeing 737, and similar scenes from the original "Turbulence." This flick is grounded."
Turbulence 2: The worst movie ever
Biff Fearless | 11/24/2000
(1 out of 5 stars)
"When I saw this movie I was thinking what kind of person would even decide to make this movie. They would've saved a lot of money if they just decided to not make this movie at all. First of all, the special effects were just horrible and the scenes were just like Turbulence. If I were you i would stay away from that movie."
Hmmmm....an okay movie
Tan Jun Yang, Amos | Singapore | 07/01/2000
(3 out of 5 stars)
"I'm a basically an aviation junkie, but I do not really enjoy this movie. When you watch this movie,I found out that some of the parts are the same as the original Turbulence,and those parts are quite blurry.It is about a Trans Con Boeing 747 hijacked,with a chemical toxin onboard.It flies through a storm with the ILS navigational system down.The part I liked most is when the bad guy opens a passenger door and throws a passenger out of the plane while it the plane descends to Sea Tac airport for landing.That's all!"