(Drama) In April 1994, one of the most heinous genocides in world history began in the African nation of Rwanda. Over the course of 100 days, an estimated 800,000 people were killed in a terrifying purge by Hutu nationalis... more »ts against their Tutsi countrymen. This harrowing HBO Films drama focuses on the almost indescribable human atrocities that took place a decade ago through the story of two Hutu brothers--one in the military, one a radio personality--whose relationship and private lives were forever changed in the midst of the genocide. Written and directed by Raoul Peck, (HBO Films' Lumumba) the movie is the first large-scale film about the 100 days of the 1994 Rwandan genocide to be shot in Rwanda, in the locations where the real-life events transpired.DVD Features:
Sharon F. (Shar) from AVON PARK, FL Reviewed on 6/11/2022...
Brillant, but another movie that is hard to watch because of the violence imposed on innocent people.
2 of 2 member(s) found this review helpful.
Barbara A. from SUN CITY, CA Reviewed on 8/26/2008...
Perhaps a contender for a repeat Rawanda movie, but this one is far deeper and individualized. Idris Elba is fantastic as the grieving soldier who is forced to search for his entire family and yet stay loyal to his country. I have watched Hotel Rawanda at least 5 times, but Sometimes in April has a totally deeper feeling - and it makes me wonder why our government stood by as Debra Winger tried so hard to get help for the people of Rawanda. Even better than Hotel Rawanda, Sometimes in April has our feelings run far stronger and the rain never stopping.
1 of 1 member(s) found this review helpful.
Movie Reviews
One of the best films of the new year,
Russell Fanelli | Longmeadow, MA USA | 04/17/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"HBO continues to make exceptional films that should be seen in theaters and Sometimes in April is no exception. Without sensationalizing the violence of the Hutus against the Tutsis in 1994, director/writer Raoul Peck nonetheless dramatizes the horror of the mass murder that took place in Rwanda.
One scene in particular illustrates the contrast of vicious Hutu army killers with the heroism of their victims. The Hutu army has stormed a Christian Preparatory School for girls and found a young black teacher with fifty or so of her students hiding in a large classroom space. The army officer demands that the Hutus among the girls step away from their classmates, not knowing that the girls have already decided to stay together and support each other. The officer becomes frustrated with the rejection of his order and opens fire with his men killing all but three of the young women.
Time and again cowardly, machete wielding Hutu thugs are confronted with the heroism of their victims. Hutu radio has characterized all Tutsis as "cockroaches" and exhorts all Hutus to completely eliminate them from society. In a little over three months over a million Tutsis and their Hutu supporters are brutally murdered.
How could the world, and in particular we in the United States, have watched with indifference? The answer seems to be that Rwanda is a poor, small country in the center of Africa with no strategic or commercial importance to anyone. Debra Winger plays the part of a key Washington official who tries to persuade the government to intervene, but with little or no support from anyone.
At the heart of Sometimes in April is the story of a captain in the Hutu army who has a Tutsi wife and three children. This young officer experiences the tragedy of the genocide as he attempts to protect his family against the stupidity and evil that engulf his country. The fact that he is Hutu and an outstanding officer with a fine record makes no difference in determining the fate of his family or anyone else with Tutsi blood.
Sometimes in April is an outstanding film that is sure to be in contention for honors as one of the best movies in 2005. Those viewers unable to see this film on HBO are encouraged to get the DVD. They will not be disappointed."
Even more powerful than Hotel Rwanda
Schtinky | California | 05/19/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Sometimes In April is a shocking portrayal of the lives of Rwandan survivors Augustine Muganza (excellently played by Idris Elba) and Sister Martine (talented Pamela Nomvete). While lacking the flair of Hotel Rwanda, `Sometimes' makes up for flash with brutal reality of the atrocities committed in 1994.
The movie bounces back and forth between the genocide in 1994 and 2004, when Augustine's brother Honore is on trial for his involvement with the genocide through his radio broadcasts on RTLM "Hutu Radio" show. Honore was a journalist who got caught up in the propaganda he spewed out over the airwaves, until the violence comes to his own family.
In 2004, Augustine is with Martine, and the movie goes backward in time from Honore's trial to document the horrors that both Augustine and Martine survived. This made for HBO movie is much more graphic than theater-released Hotel Rwanda, brutally shoving into your face the mass murder of innocent catholic schoolgirls, horrific testimony from a mother who was tortured and raped for days on end, and the callus indifference of the westernized world.
"It's just Rwandans killing Rwandans," says one official. "We have no oil, no dams, there is nothing in Rwanda for you," says Rwandan militia member, encouraging the US to stay out of the genocide. Equally as appalling as the mass murders are real-clips from Prudence Bushnell as she coldly described how the US classified Genocide, and all the political back-speak as the western nations tried to cover their impassiveness with words while one million human beings died.
Sometimes In April is a powerful, must-see movie, but not for the squeamish or feint of heart. It is brutal, and reminds us to "Never Forget". Expertly directed by Raoul Peck and filled with unknown but very talented actors, `Sometimes' will grab your attention and not let you go until the end. I did find the movie a bit hard to follow at times with the time-jumps, but not overwhelmingly so. Horrifically good movie with realistic portrayal. Enjoy!
"
A Film Even More Powerful for its Simplicity of Presentation
Grady Harp | Los Angeles, CA United States | 04/16/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"The gruesome tragedy of the genocide in Rwanda in 1994 absolutely must become public knowledge if we are to maintain the watch for symptoms of similar acts in the present and the future. HOTEL RWANDA was a fine film that capitalized on the heroism of one man, and justly so, for his selfless vision that saved many lives. But as far as a film that relates the same story without the emphasis on one hero, SOMETIMES IN APRIL is for this reviewer more powerful: the genocide speaks more loudly because it focuses on the victims.
Writer/Director Raoul Peck has created a stunning impact with this film made for HBO. The details of the history of the rebellion of the Tutsis against the Hutus is clearly explained and made far more understandable than in previous efforts. Peck wisely utilizes the talents of Idris Elba and Carole Karemera as the husband and wife of mixed marriage and it is their story of survival and witness that makes this examination of Rwanda so intense. Oris Erhuero and Debra Winger among others feel completely committed to this story in the way they bring honesty and credibility to their roles.
Photographed on location, this film is at first a country beautiful to look at and then the beauty of the land filled with corpses is nearly unbearable. The contrast is typical of the way Raoul Peck has sculpted this important film. By Hollywood standards as well as by Public Information standards, this is a film that should be seen by everyone as not only a fine movie but also an important documentation of a tragedy that should have never been ignored. Grady Harp, April 05"
One Hundred Days of Hell!
Mr D. | Cave Creek, Az United States | 08/17/2005
(4 out of 5 stars)
"Genocide: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group
It's not easy to watch a movie about genocide. It's not even easy to hear news accounts of these kind of atrocities but that doesn't mean they shouldn't make these kinds of movies. No, by all means, horrific brutality and indifference to life should be memorialized. The perpetrators should be shown for what they are, young, idle, power hungry, sociopaths, not unlike the street gangs and terrorists we presently face.
The Rwandan Genocide
The Rwandan Genocide killed almost a million Rwandans of both Tutsi and Hutu ancestry(?) The Hutus outnumbered the Tutsis by almost six to one but had historically been subservient socially and economically to the Tutsis.
There is really very little difference between the tribes who share a common language and history and had gotten along well and been intermarrying for four hundred years. Physical differences had almost disappeared totally when Belgian colonialists, who had taken over the country from Germany after the First World War, started categorizing the population as either Tutsi or Hutu based on their version of physical traits. Still even though arbitrarily ethnically divided, the newly defined Huts and Tutsis got along fairly well, even though the Tutsis were the Belgian darlings and had been put in charge, via a monarchy.
This changed in the sixties when the sister countries of Rwanda and Burundi received their independence. Hutus outnumbering the Tutsis took control of the government and lashed out at their oppressors, killing thousands and sending hundreds of thousands of refugees into neighboring countries. Eventually a group of Tutsi ex-patriots decided to take their country back by forming the RPF (Rwandan Patriotic Front) and invading Rwanda in 1990.
This set the stage for the murder and mayhem of Tutsi and so called collaborating Hutus, including the systematic slaughter of innocent women and children which took place in the spring of 1993. This is the setting for one man's story in the movie Sometimes in April
I cannot begin to imagine what it must have been like to go through something like this, yet thousands of survivors must have witnessed or heard about their wives, husbands, brothers, mothers, sisters, fathers, sons, daughters, nephews, nieces, in laws or friends butchered like vermin. There was no mercy, no humanity, no hesitation, only grim determination to wipe out all vestiges of the Tutsi tribe from Rwanda.
Our hero, Augustin (Idris Alba)- I really don't know whether to call him a hero but being a Hutu and former soldier, on the run from fellow Hutus, made him seem like one - lost his entire family and his best friend to the madness that was present in that spring in 1993. His brother Honore, (Oris Erhuero) was complicit in the rampage as a radio personality exhorting and inciting the mobs that roamed the streets and countryside of Rwanda but he got to see the results of his evil deeds first hand, while trying to perform his only good deed, witnessed the murder of his two nephews. His sister in law was wounded and he later managed to get her to church refuge, where she later died.
Augustin, after seeing his friend Lionel shot to death in front of him, manages to find safe haven in a hotel (Not the hotel in Hotel Rwanda but didn't know his families whereabouts. He later finds and starts to take care of Jeanne, (Carole Karemera)the woman who tried to save his daughter, both of whom were part of a mass gunning in the Catholic school she attended. Eventually in the present time Augustin finds out from his brother, jailed in neighboring Tanzania, what befell the rest of his family.
The story was told from present time with Augustin reflecting back to his ordeal. Saying there was a story is probably a misnomer. The story in the early part was denial, escape, helplessness, hide, resolve, hunt, terror, cruelty, kill, finality, death, SURVIVE and in the latter part anguish, melancholy, memories, hope, loss of hope, apathy, move on, SURVIVE.
Conclusion
This movie was a colossal downer, though the story did need to be told and viewed. It lasts some two hours and twenty minutes but it never dragged. The film moved along well and held my interest the whole time. I thought the director, Raoul Peck, did a magnificent job and even though this was a made for TV (HBO) movie it never seemed low budget. The acting was nothing short of sensational. The fear was palpable as was the anxiety and other emotions.
As you might imagine hundreds if not thousands of actors participated on both sides of the line dividing good and evil. I couldn't get over the cavalier attitude of the young executioners, their total disregard for life. I noticed they kept referring to their victims as snakes or cockroaches as if calling them that made them less then human and made them feel more like exterminators. I'm sure this is the mindset that took place in all previous genocides and the current extermination going on in Dafur, Sudan."
A moving and unsentimental film
Flower Girl | northeast | 03/24/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"While Hotel Rwanda has certainly received more press than Sometimes in April, I think this film stands on it's own as an accurate and gritty account of the genocide that took place in Rwanda in 1994.
With the exception of the U.S. Government scenes, Sometimes in April is exteremely well acted. It is certainly bloodier and more violent than Hotel Rwanda and it portays the terror of the situation in a more matter-of-fact manner. One has a real feeling of dread and tension watching this film.
I really feel one should watch both movies as they compliment one another tremendously."