In the amazon jungle a pharmaceutical team searches for the secret to extending life. After their helipcopter crashes the team & their guide encounters a terror unknown to modern man a terror which not only decimates t... more »heir team but has left a trail of carnage in its path. Studio: First Look Home Entertain Release Date: 03/21/2006 Starring: Stephen Baldwin Run time: 97 minutes Rating: R« less
Susan I. (mustang05) from PLAINFIELD, IL Reviewed on 1/22/2010...
What can I say,I've seen better movies.
1 of 2 member(s) found this review helpful.
Movie Reviews
Anaconda 1 and 2
Joshua Koppel | Chicago, IL United States | 11/03/2006
(3 out of 5 stars)
"An expedition in the Amazon finds a sarcophagus with a preserved mummy inside. Research shows the Amazon Man died when he was more than 300 years old. This sends a new team to find the source of the longevity and a now suspected lost tribe. The team, mostly made up of typical greed-oriented characters, join a helicopter pilot (Baldwin) and set off into the jungle. The team already there gets attacked while the new team's helicopter crashes. Luckily the pilot just happens to speak Jaguar and enlists aid from the Jaguar people.
Soon we meet the lost tribe and see lots of giant snake attacks. The tribe is interesting. White man only just theorized that such a tribe could exist and yet the chief speaks English (the Jaguar people who trade with Western civilization only speak their own language). This lost tribe is the Snake People and they worship Naga, a snake god. They also hold the secret of longevity which is a gift to the Snake People. Add greed, a giant snake that may have more than one head (or may be multiple snakes as the images are contradictory), a tribe trying to protect itself and a pair of characters that actually care what is going on and you get a silly, schlocky monster film. You'll have to watch to find out who survives.
Watching this movie is like watching both Anaconda movies at once. We have the lost tribe of the first movie and the longevity and multiple snakes of the second. Baldwin plays a character who looks and sounds a lot like Voight's character in the first. But it doesn't stop there. Movie fans will recognize a lot of scenes from other movies including one from Godzilla vs. Spacegodzilla. The snake monster is also a puzzler. Many times we see the snake and enough of its body to see it has only one head. Halfway through the movie the other heads show up but seem to spring out of nowhere. Idols show Naga having multiple heads but the special effects seem confused. It almost like they got halfway through the movie and decided to make the snake more monstrous by adding additional heads. But whatever the case the thing does a lot of hunting and killing but very little eating. If you want a silly monster film that requires little thought, or one where thought can actually ruin it, then this one is for you. If you want something a little better than this won't fit the bill. Still, it is fun in the right circumstances, just don't expect a lot from it."
Another anaconda wannabe movie
T. Winston | 05/02/2006
(3 out of 5 stars)
"This movie wasn't really that bad but it was very similar to the movie "Anaconda, Hunt for the Blood Orchid". This film is basically about a group of people who come across remains of a man who they claimed lived up to 300 years. Now they are on a quest to find this secret to long life in the Brazilian jungle where they had found him. Of course they come across some obstacles. Some of the members get eaten by the huge snake and others are captured by a tribe known as the snake people who are related to the deceased ancient man. Now they must try to get the ancient man back and return it to the snake people if they want to make it out alive. Then the battle continues.
I must say, the computer graphic image for the snake was not that good. On some scenes it look computerized and did not look believeable. But overall, this movie doesn't compare to Anaconda, Hunt for the Blood Orchid. That movie was way better."
Had to interject here...
Chevy Chase | atlanta, ga | 07/26/2006
(1 out of 5 stars)
"Okay, I'm sorry but did that kid just say that this was one of the better monster movies he has seen. Hey kid, go rent Relic.
Thats a good monster movie with a fairly believable beastie.
The monster in this movie looks like something doctored up for a cgi spot on a Fruit Loops commercial. The acting is relatively decent for a B movie, but the plot is ridiculous and shallow. The love scenes are contrived and the whole movie collapses under its own false pretentions.
This movie is a must no- see.
Thank you for your time and believe me, you will thank me for mine."
"You Come For The Gift?"
Robert I. Hedges | 05/26/2008
(2 out of 5 stars)
"Great. Another giant snake movie. This one is generally much more trying than the "Anaconda" or "Python" films, and has among the worst CGI I have ever seen in my life. I really shouldn't be too shocked...as soon as I saw Boaz Davidson's producer credit I knew this would be tough slogging.
The film, set in Brazil and actually made there (for which I give the production team credit), is a story of mysterious snake people who live for hundreds of years and the evil corporate goons who want to steal and exploit their secret. While "Anaconda" and "Python" (and other similar movies) have had menacingly large snakes, here the producers pull out all the stops and devise a humongous seven-headed snake to guard the secret of immortality. Stephen Baldwin is staggeringly banal in the lead role, but is frequently upstaged in the overacting department by most of the supporting cast, particularly Larry Day.
The film opens with a helicopter crash in a jungle (which will seem very familiar to Boaz Davidson aficionados), and progresses to scientists being tormented by the snake with homage paid to many creature features before. The heroine, Susan, is rapidly kidnapped by the natives, and tries to free herself by making a deal with her evil capitalist bosses to return a mummy that was taken from the snake people. Needless to say, this doesn't work out as she expected, and results in a mini invasion of evil corporate types, which, of course, as any experienced viewer of this genre grasps means that the snake chow has arrived.
Throughout the movie there are a variety of native actors who actually give the best performances of the film, despite their ludicrous costumes. In the end the giant murderous multi-headed reptile turns out to be the good guy (sort of) and helps the two lead characters find love in what might be one of the most ridiculously implausible yet noxiously saccharine scenes ever. To further continue the obvious plotlines, the evil guy gets his just reward: being drawn and quartered by a giant snake is certainly original punishment.
At the end of this film I felt relief that it was over, but I must confess that it did have more originality than most other Davidson projects that I have seen, so I gave it two stars. The disc also contains a "Behind the Scenes" feature in which cast and crew offer platitudes about what a great movie "Snakeman" is. While my opinion is that they are decidedly incorrect, I think the only genuinely insightful quote in the extras is from Stephen Baldwin, who says "I would have liked my character to have been eight pounds lighter." If that's all he wants changed about this film, I think I'll pass on his future artistic endeavors."
And You Thought "Python" was bad!!????
Graboidz | Westminster, Maryland | 07/25/2006
(1 out of 5 stars)
"If you ever have the unfortunate experience of seeing the Robert Englund dud "Python" then consider yourself lucky! I have seen "Python" and thought "Well at least I can say I've seen the worst Large Reptile movie ever made!" And in my blissful ignorance someone set out to make an even worse large-reptile film.....featuring a Baldwin brother to boot! "Snakeman" is awful. It's not really a horror film as much as it tries to be a Jungle adventure flick. You get Southern California masquerading as Brazil this time, with some really unconvincing natives running around sporting more whicker than an IKEA catalog! I think they should have just gotten a big rubber snake and run through the woods with it, that would have been a little more convincing than the cartoony-CGI effects that are attempted here.
If you see this stinker sitting on the shelf of your local Blockbuster for $1.99 like I did, you may be tempted to pick it up out of curiosity.....don't. It may be a small monetary investment, but it's almost 2 hours you can never get back!!"