Sarah Wolfe was the only living survivor from the massacre at the Vanacutt Mansion, but no one believed her claims that ghosts were responsible for the gruesome murders that took place there. Now her recent and questionabl... more »e suicide leaves her sister, Ariel, no choice but to devote herself to finding out who - or what - was responsible for her death. Ariel discovers that Sarah sent her the diary of the sadistic Dr. Vanacutt just before she died, offering clues to the diabolical evil that resides within the house. But the diary also makes Ariel a target in a deadly treasure hunt that leads a group of unwitting victims back to the Vanacutt Mansion, reawakening the terror imprisoned within the house on the hill.This time, the house and the evil spirits inside are out to make sure that no one leaves alive.« less
Chad B. (abrnt1) from CABERY, IL Reviewed on 2/4/2013...
Pointless waste of time. This film is complete & utter trash. It's a sequel that serves no purpose whatsoever. Bad acting,cheesy effects & a pointless story.
Teja K. (tattoodum) from ROCKLIN, CA Reviewed on 1/6/2010...
It was alright. I liked the first one much better, it had more known actors, and Geoffrey Rush's sense of humor. This one didn't have much of a plot, and got more on the sci-fi side then horror. I wouldn't go out of my way to see it again.
Felicia C. from COLUMBUS, GA Reviewed on 12/1/2009...
great movie, better than the first one
Sylvia W. (cambray) from JOHNSTOWN, PA Reviewed on 11/3/2009...
It was good. The same as the first one.
1 of 1 member(s) found this review helpful.
Movie Reviews
I'm confused about one thing
Jodizo | Canutillo, Texas United States | 10/18/2007
(3 out of 5 stars)
"I keep reading the reviews posted here and everyone keeps saying Sarah was the only survivor. Maybe all of you have a different version of the movie, mine shows her AND Eddie Baker on the ledge at the end. Did she push him off the ledge? I hope your reviews on the sequel are more accurate"
Lame and too short!
Kevin Knitt | Tampa Bay, FL | 10/18/2007
(3 out of 5 stars)
"OK, first off, Sarah was not the only survivor of that night, we also had Token. He and Sarah both made it through the door since they were not related to anyone from the original massacre, but sadly neither of them appear in this film.
Now, the movie plot was very amateurish, and the dialog was lame. Most of the effects were CGI including some very bad kills. Nothing new to see here and I would suggest you watch this only if there is nothing left at the rental house. The running time of the actual movie sans credits is about 1 hour 15 minutes.
I WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED!"
Much better than is suggested in other reviews
marky77 | England | 03/21/2009
(4 out of 5 stars)
"In my opinion, "Return To House On Haunted Hill" was a very good sequel to "House On Haunted Hill" (although it would have been better if one or both or the survivors from the first movie had been in this).
It is gory, suspeceful, and has mostly origional deaths - what more could you want from this type of movie? There were a lot more people in the house this time than in the first (about 10) so there is a higher body count, too.
Althought there is quite a lot of gore in this movie (a lot more than in the first movie) it wasn't as gory or over the top as most people were suggesting. But the best thing about the movie I thought was that, while most horror movies either concentrate on either being suspenceful and creepy, or on being violent and bloody, this movie had both gory deaths and suspenceful scenes, so you get the best of both worlds.
Overall a very good sequel, which I'm sure fans of the first movie will enjoy. After seeing this I'm certainly hoping that there will be a third movie in the series."
Gory and Boring
Tsuyoshi | Kyoto, Japan | 11/28/2007
(2 out of 5 stars)
""Return to House on Haunted Hill," sequel to "House on Haunted Hill" made (or remade) in 1999, has decent production designs and photography, but ultimately doesn't have enough narrative skills to interest us throughout the entire film. Like the 1999 original, the new film has a lot of effects including gores (including the gory one of the "operation" scene which Jigsaw might love to see). I don't hate seeing them at all, but its boring story is another thing.
In "Return to House on Haunted Hill" we see yet again characters trapped in the abandoned asylum "the Vanacutt Mansion" for the most unconvincing reasons - treasure hunting. Ariel Wolfe, fashion magazine editor and sister of Sarah, one of the survivors of the incident seen in the previous film, is kidnapped and forced to enter this dilapidated building where ghosts seem still roaming. Unfortunately you don't see Ali Larter or Jeffrey Rush here (though Jeffrey Combs reprises his role as the doctor). Amanda Righetti plays Ariel and she is not bad.
Anyway, you will see Ariel and other characters including mercenaries, a professor and his assistant looking for a relic, etc, and some of them picked off one by one when they (unaccountably) refuse to stick together, according to the genre's tired cliché. This is where we need a better script because once they are locked in, we have to wait for the scary and gory moments to come, which somehow include lesbianism and nudity. It seems the characters don't know what they really want to do, getting out or staying in, but even these ghosts don't know what they are supposed to do."
Raising Hell
Santeria | Tallahassee | 10/07/2008
(4 out of 5 stars)
"And putting it to rest.
Wow!! This is one of those sequels that fully justify its existence.Kind of rare in some forms of Horror, and not what I was expecting in the HOUSE ON HAUNTED HILL style. About all I missed in this film was the very stylised jerky ghost moves that characterised the first film. Whilst the Barebones structure of the plot of the search for the Statue, the Quest of Dr Richard Hammer, holds the film together, the carefully detailed death scenes spook the daylights out of anyone watching.
There is no commentary in this disc. However, the confessional elements in the features are very unique and cover some different ground in this style of supernatural splatter-fest.
And once again, this disc proves that the UNRATED format is the Gold standard."