This movie does not deserve to have "scarface" in the title!
B. Fitzgerald | salem, or | 12/15/2003
(1 out of 5 stars)
"this movie was easily one of the worst movies i have ever seen. it had POOR acting POOR picture quality POOR fighting scenes absolutly no plot and is definately NOT worth watching,renting, or buying."
Scarface
Andrew Goad | Muncie, IN USA | 08/31/2005
(3 out of 5 stars)
"Its not perfect, the picture isn't dvd quality because of the age of the movie I guess, its weird there not being more music in the background, but I thought it was ok. I thought there was a plot unlike another review said, its not worth paying a lot for, but if you can find a cheap copy like I did it might be worth looking into, I only paid a dollar for mine so if you cant find it too cheap dont buy it expecting a modern day special effect, musical score, and acting status movie, remember it was made in 1976 when thinking about getting it."
I like Jack Palance a lot, But this movie was no good
Mr_No_Name | richmond, va usa | 12/28/2005
(1 out of 5 stars)
"A gangster is killed by a rival mobster [Jack Palance]. Years later, His son goes looking for the man that killed his father. This movie was no good. Acting is bad, The action is boring, The fight scenes are very bad, And the story is just too predictable. This italian gangster movie doesn't even deserve to have a talented actor like Jack Palance as its star. This movie isn't worth owning, Even if it is now a bargain title. Hope the review helped. I'm out"