Wow this one is bad
David W. Doppes | Columbus, Ohio | 11/04/2006
(1 out of 5 stars)
"I wanted to give this one a chance. And I like to see a young director and cast try to make something special without a lot of cash, but this just looks poor. The makeup for the zombies isn't too bad, until bad camera work shows the end of the makeup about an inch before the hair on the back of their heads. Looks really bad considering the makeup is a blue color, then you see white skin then hair. Thats just for beginners, the camera used for this film was a good idea(grainy 70's look), but please come up with better actors and record the sound better. You can't hear it unless you crank the volume. The people who gave this a good review on the box, should be in jail. I do not recommend this one, unless your last name is Bin Laden. One more thing, there is frontal nudity in this movie and its not the good kind, its a guy."
Erm, no.
R. Nath | Midwest | 09/07/2006
(1 out of 5 stars)
"Ok, just in general I am a junkie of many things zombie. This sucks. Don't bother with it.
Plot Spoiler: Do not read if you haven't seen or just ate.
One guy gets his schlong bitten off because he tried to have sex with a zombie. Very very graphically. Even for me that was over the line in how it was done. Fake but *shiver*."
How did this get distribution?
D. J. Calvert | 08/23/2006
(1 out of 5 stars)
"Seriously, how did this movie get a distribution deal?
I've seen better production values and far superior acting in family vacation films.
This wasn't even so bad it was good.
Worst movie since Forsaken. Don't spend your time even reading the reviews about it."
HORRIBLE
A. Karabinos | 08/23/2006
(1 out of 5 stars)
"If i could give negative stars i would. This is terrible. I saw this at a friends house. I can forgive the crappy Cinematography as Artsy, but the overwhelmingly terrible Acting, Dialouge, Sound, Editing, and lack of an interesting plot just make this a punishment to see. Dont waste your money on this. Look for something else."