Could this movie possibly suck more?
01/17/2003
(1 out of 5 stars)
"It's basically a porno that doesn't let you see anything. Plot: 7 or 8 ugly guys switch between telling a boring "true" story in monotones and scenes of sex. While they are all completely naked at one point or another, it's softcore, so you don't actually see anything. All the men are ugly anyway, so there's really no point. Rocks have better acting skills, to the point where you can actually see one of the actors reading his lines off a cue card.In the end, you're better off spending your money on a REAL porno that will offer hotter guys, better lines, SOME semblance of a plot, and actual sex."
A real disappointment...
07/20/2002
(1 out of 5 stars)
"I knew I was in for a real disappointment when boredom set in within the first 10 minutes of the movie. It's a plotless flick where Seb, who was recently dumped by his boyfriend, begins a quest for a new mate. He meets Georgie at a local 'sauna' and starts a sexual spree where he procees to engage in encounters with nearly anyone who crosses his path. Totally absent of talent, the actors display a lot of flesh, however, strategic camera angles leave everything to the imagiation. All in all it's a pretty worthless film. I rushed out and bought it, and I'm sorry I did!!"
Absolutely awful.
11/24/2002
(1 out of 5 stars)
"awful, save your money and watch tv."
A great Movie
07/20/2002
(5 out of 5 stars)
"This movie is so good visually. There are about 6 scenes of sexual intercourse, very erotic scenes. Thats all i can say about the movie due to guidelines."