Till Death Do They Part!A beautiful young bride marries into a family with a dark secret and quickly becomes haunted by dreams of a mysterious woman. When her visions become flesh, the newlywed finds herself drawn into a n... more »ightmare of unholy communion, violent murder and forbidden sexual desires.Written and directed by Vicente Aranda (LOVERS) and starring Simon Andreu (BEYOND RE-ANIMATOR, THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA: PRINCE CASPIAN), Maribel Martin (A BELL FROM HELL), and Alexandra Bastedo (THE GHOUL), this haunting shocker of lesbianism and reincarnation is based upon Le Fanu's immortal vampire tale "Carmila." THE BLOOD SPATTERED BRIDE has been restored from the original negative materials and is presented completely uncut and uncensored.EXTRAS:
"You won't find a better 1972 Spanish-produced vampire movie (the dialog is in English). I first saw it in a revival theater in LA during a "Grindhouse" month for which Quentin Tarantino had selected all the films; he made it a double feature with a Mexican gem titled "Mary, Mary, Bloody Mary" (1975).
"Bride" concerns a young bride and her boorish husband, and the ghostly woman who comes between them. No one morphs into a bat or carries garlic, though, and the supernatural threat is never fully explained, so very literal-minded people might avoid the word "vampire." This movie is its own thing.
It is worthwhile chiefly for its many haunting images (some even surreal), and I like that it takes a real stab (pun intended) at ideas and characters who are more than one dimensional (though not 100% successfully). There's a little nudity, but the pacing is more concerned with atmosphere than action. Some of the scares fall flat -- but there are also some truly startling moments.
If you appreciate unique, atmospheric horror that is very 1972 in its ideas and execution, then buy this DVD. It is a minor classic.
Unfortunately, there are no special features."
Honeymoon from hell
C. Christopher Blackshere | I am the devil's reject | 07/31/2009
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Now this is my type of bloody insanity! The Blood Spattered Bride is one bone-chilling and inducing piece of horror cinema. The kind of film they don't even try to make anymore, unfortunately. It's extremely creepy, atmospheric, erotic, and totally bizarre. Anybody who rates this only 3 stars must be a Twilight lover.
It starts off in alarming fashion. A pair of newlyweds check into the hotel, ready to consummate their marriage I assume. Things don't go quite as planned. The Bride gets viciously attacked, stripped and mounted by an intruder who was hiding in the closet. It's so freaking disturbing to see this women totally exposed in unruly fashion. Luckily, this just happens to be a dark figment of the imagination. Or a hidden desire, perhaps? This early sequence sets the tone, plus it is a bit of foreshadowing.
The couple eventually settle in at a different hotel, and a battle of the sexes begins to ensue. Their sexual desires seem to completely clash. To top it off, the hotel itself has quite a tainted past. So when another beautiful, mysterious woman starts to stalk the bride, nightmares begin to surface as reality gets distorted. It's estrogenic madness!
There is plenty of sexual tension that just oozes off the screen, while the violence steadily simmers towards its boiling point. I for one really love the pacing and bizarre plot developments of this story, but it's not for everyone. It includes gallons of blood, full frontal female nudity, misogyny, lesbianism, vampirism...man, it's total horror heaven! Only from the almighty 70's.
"
The "vampire" intimacy
Bartok Kinski | Prague | 09/09/2008
(3 out of 5 stars)
"The film is inspired by Le Fanu's story Carmila. Pretty much the same identical story: a castle, a curse. It is a very slow movie for today's criterion, but this makes the innovative imagery even more shocking and surprising, most of the film's credit must go to the performances of the lovely leading ladies. The movie isn't a very close version of Sheridan Le Fanu's pompous novel "Carmilla" and it has got nothing to do with Matthew G. Lewis as far as I can tell. The "vampire" intimacy in this film is tied to themes of virginity and rape - most other vampire flicks sort of hint at this but none that I can remember spell it out so clearly. It is exceedingly Freudian in this film. The lesbian vampire catalyst is fueled more by hatred for men than a hunger, a need for blood. The killing is to vindicate, the blood drinking is an aside. The film does a good stint of keeping the audience off balance by cleverly smudging the line between reality and Susan's fantasies and delusions.
The film is a little outstretched, but the plot is complex. After all is said and done the film actually has significance (unlike many films in the genre). It would be notable if someone remade this film and tightened the pacing a bit."
Not bad bit of horror, with the bewitching Ms. Bastedo
Michael D. Chlanda | 07/02/2009
(5 out of 5 stars)
"An interesting bit of a horror film. The bewitching Ms. Bastedo takes the movie, with her cool, yet seductive, portrayal. If they could ever find it, and if it's uncut, Kashmiri Run, would be another fine example of her work. Her eyes, her lips, and her demeanor, draw the viewer in. Enough said."
Battle of the sexes......with hot vampires!
trashcanman | Hanford, CA United States | 07/09/2009
(3 out of 5 stars)
"There is probably no less appreciated and poorly-utilized character in cult cinema history then Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu's Carmilla. The novella is in it's own way nearly as classic and influential as Dracula in vampire lore, single-handedly creating the female vampire genre as it continues today. Heck, even the undead king himself has taken to using anagrams of his name on occasion, which originated in "Carmilla". But while Drac is a household name and has had countless high-profile adaptations that nearly always treat his character with great weight and respect, his sister-in-undeath is seldom utilized with any effectiveness. While Hammer's excellent The Vampire Lovers very successfully adapted the story while accentuating the thick feminine sexuality that permeated the novel but was not expounded upon, it seems every adaptation since has treated the story and character flippantly. From the terrible love scene in Lust for a Vampire featuring Carmilla at the mercy of a human man who seduces and conquers her to the absolutely godawful recent "film" Vampires Vs. Zombies, which poorly attempted to modernize the tale and added zombies for no reason other then to utilize the attention-grabbing title, Carmilla has been to cinematic hell and back.
"The Blood Spattered Bride" has a lot of strikes against it, but a lot going for it as well. As an adaptation of "Carmilla" -as it purports to be- it fails miserably. Hell, they didn't even spell her name right. But as a 70's grindhouse cult classic it definitely succeeds. I'll tell you right now that if they had left Le Fanu's name off of this, it would have gotten an extra star. The film is dark, unique in tone and theme, and sometimes explosively violent. One scene in particular is sure to make men and women alike seriously uncomfortable. The premise is somewhat similar to the original work, but centers on a newlywed who seems quite uncomfortable with her new husband, whose attitude and sexual appetites are a bit gruff. She is stalked from afar by a mysterious woman in white, who begins appearing in her dreams. A strange dagger begins appearing around the house, and the dreams intensify and begin driving the girl mad as she is plagued by visions of her using the blade to slaughter her husband. Then one day, the man happens upon a beautiful woman buried in the sand on the beach. This is among the oddest scenes I've ever seen, by the way. I'm not sure what makes it so; maybe it's the fact that the legendary vampire queen was using a freaking snorkel to breath from under the sand or the way that the man quickly clears the sand away from her breasts leaving us to stare at an angelic blue-eyed face behind a snorkeling mask with only her [...] visible beyond that. Who the hell came up with this? Anyways, long story short: with the bride under the thrall of the she-vamp the girls form a bit of an anti-male crusade. But can two super-sexy immortal supernatural beings possibly overcome a viral and boorish embodiment of testosterone? Not in a Spanish movie in the 70's, sorry. Boo.
For a film that has 3 (okay maybe 2 1/2) instances of full frontal female nudity in the first 20 minutes or so, the rest of the film is sexually tame in comparison. One would think that an opportunity would be taken to juxtapose the rough sexual approach of the husband with a more sensual approach from the lesbian vampire to highlight the gender war, but the girl-girl sexual element is small; real small in comparison to the initial assault of brutish male conquest in the early scenes of the film. There are serious pacing and balance issues all around on this one. Also of note is a scene where the male characters shoot an agonized fox with his leg caught in a trap in the head. This scene is not fake. It is thankfully recalled in a scene later in the film so as not to make such a sickening spectacle as completely pointless as it appeared to be, but I simply do not enjoy seeing something like that. Fake violence, people; I like my violence fictitious. Still, the film gains a lot of exploitation points for it's brazenness. And if you think the fabulously evocative title sounds familiar to you, one Quentin Tarantino utilized it in the homage-heavy exploitation-fest Kill Bill.
So while the results are a bit disappointing considering what could have been, "The Blood Spattered Bride" is certainly worth a peak if you're a 70's vampire fanatic. It may be artistically half-baked, but it delivers plenty of cheap thrills and chills and has at least one scene that is an absolute must-see classic of violent imagery. The men vs women approach is pretty fresh from this perspective and I just wish it had been handled a little better because this film had "potential classic" written all over it. It's almost nothing like the supposed source material, but as a stand alone story it's pretty damn good. Sadly, it should have been great, but seems to have been weighed down by the misogyny of the time and place it was made. Pity.